Re: Re: S-expressions

>  Ah, thats pretty simple. Its a prefix syntax so the first token inside parans is the 
> function the remaining tokens the arguments. Its pretty simple. 

	Only simple if not deeply nested which s-expressions/mstates require.

> > The lisp/scheme syntax always looked very strange for me because of 
> > the enormous amount of parens. I felt it always hard to match them 
> > and to understand which arguments belonged together, etc. 
>   
>  Your editor should do a pretty good job of matching. As for the arguments this has 
> always seemed really strait forward to me. 

	Simple answer BS.  Complete answer anything that relies on a editor to make
it "right" is flawed by definition.

	--Aryeh

------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
Buy Ink Cartridges or Refill Kits for Your HP, Epson, Canon or Lexmark
Printer at Myinks.com. Free s/h on orders $50 or more to the US & Canada. http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5511
http://us.click.yahoo.com/l.m7sD/LIdGAA/qnsNAA/W4wwlB/TM
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
pragmatic_lang-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@public.gmane.org

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/