Re: Refactoring to a Closure

In article <[email protected]>,
    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kim_Gr=E4sman?= <[email protected]>  writes:

> Of course, I rarely use closures myself, working in C++, so I could be
> missing something.

C++ admits many programming paradigms.  Using a functional paradigm
was painful because of the limited nature of the binders in the C++
standard library.  TR1 changes that to make it much easier to code in
a functional style without having to manually write all the boiler
plate glue.  I expect the functional style to gain more traction in
the future because of this.
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" -- DirectX 9 draft available for download
 <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com/the-direct3d-graphics-pipeline/>

      Legalize Adulthood! <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/