Re: Refactoring to a Closure

Kim Gräsman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.refactoring
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Richard,

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:31, Richard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In article <[email protected]>,
>    =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kim_Gr=E4sman?= <[email protected]>  writes:
>
>> Of course, I rarely use closures myself, working in C++, so I could be
>> missing something.
>
> C++ admits many programming paradigms.  Using a functional paradigm
> was painful because of the limited nature of the binders in the C++
> standard library.  TR1 changes that to make it much easier to code in
> a functional style without having to manually write all the boiler
> plate glue.  I expect the functional style to gain more traction in
> the future because of this.

Yes, and C++0x actually comes with lambda expression support, so it's
definitely on its way.

Thanks,
- Kim


------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.