Re: Refactoring to a Closure
Kim Gräsman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.refactoring |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Richard, On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 01:31, Richard <[email protected]> wrote: > > In article <[email protected]>, > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kim_Gr=E4sman?= <[email protected]> writes: > >> Of course, I rarely use closures myself, working in C++, so I could be >> missing something. > > C++ admits many programming paradigms. Using a functional paradigm > was painful because of the limited nature of the binders in the C++ > standard library. TR1 changes that to make it much easier to code in > a functional style without having to manually write all the boiler > plate glue. I expect the functional style to gain more traction in > the future because of this. Yes, and C++0x actually comes with lambda expression support, so it's definitely on its way. Thanks, - Kim ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/refactoring/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/