RE: Indicators of status project for senior management
"Cass Dalton [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:06:37 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADA3vVVw6gd92XEvyGgq8441sqnk=Z7OTKLVh6EjYicY=gcNUQ@mail.gmail.com> |
I used the term features because our backlog items are usually at a much finer granularity than is digestible by management. The term feature was intended to imply a higher conceptual level than the PBL item On Jan 26, 2017 2:29 PM, "'Steve Ash' [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" < [email protected]> wrote: > > > I concur with Cass on this although I prefer to use the Scrum terminology > of ‘Backlog Items’ rather that ‘features’ – features is such a sloppy word > and not equally understood by people that use it. > > > > Basically, you can forget RAG; the only time that you are in trouble is > when the Must Have line goes below the End of Budget or Schedule lines. > > > > Hope that helps > > > > *Steve Ash* > > >