RE: Indicators of status project for senior management

"Cass Dalton [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:06:37 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general
Message-ID <CADA3vVVw6gd92XEvyGgq8441sqnk=Z7OTKLVh6EjYicY=gcNUQ@mail.gmail.com>
I used the term features because our backlog items are usually at a much
finer granularity than is digestible by management. The term feature was
intended to imply a higher conceptual level than the PBL item


On Jan 26, 2017 2:29 PM, "'Steve Ash' [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <
[email protected]> wrote:


>
>
> I concur with Cass on this although I prefer to use the Scrum terminology
> of ‘Backlog Items’ rather that ‘features’ – features is such a sloppy word
> and not equally understood by people that use it.
>
>
>
> Basically, you can forget RAG; the only time that you are in trouble is
> when the Must Have line goes below the End of Budget or Schedule lines.
>
>
>
> Hope that helps
>
>
>
> *Steve Ash*
>
> 
>