Re: Indicators of status project for senior management
"Michael Vizdos [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected]> Sat, 28 Jan 2017 16:05:47 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAMyfY1ZTSnjGQ3eoopbUDEYodhCQgEYJYAbXBuykc4h85YfYfA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi. Can you invite them to the Sprint Review and have a face-to-face conversation between the Scrum Team and the Senior Managers? This is the best way for feedback versus status reports in either direction and requires / shows commitment (and requires courage in organizations where there is fear). Thank you. - mike vizdos Focus. #deliver www.implementingscrum.com www.michaelvizdos.com On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:28 PM Cass Dalton [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I used the term features because our backlog items are usually at a much > finer granularity than is digestible by management. The term feature was > intended to imply a higher conceptual level than the PBL item > > > On Jan 26, 2017 2:29 PM, "'Steve Ash' [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I concur with Cass on this although I prefer to use the Scrum terminology > of ‘Backlog Items’ rather that ‘features’ – features is such a sloppy word > and not equally understood by people that use it. > > > > Basically, you can forget RAG; the only time that you are in trouble is > when the Must Have line goes below the End of Budget or Schedule lines. > > > > Hope that helps > > > > *Steve Ash* > > >