Re: Agility-Reducing Organizational Design Patterns Unfortunately Still Taught Today
"'Alexander Kriegisch' [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT]" <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Feb 2018 13:06:44 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.scrum.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I have just looked into your attached slide. Basically I see many things there > I agree with. What remains unclear to me is the SM role you are suggesting. > What does she do other than have conversations about meta topics with team, PO > and management? Probably I am just missing context, thus not getting the gist > of it. *Lacking* context, that was. Sorry. > Michael James [email protected] [SCRUMDEVELOPMENT] schrieb am 15.02.2018 > 17:59: > >> I’ve been sharing my opinion with some of the other Scrum trainers and >> coaches that a lot of the stuff we’ve been teaching large organizations >> (meaning more than one Scrum Team) has not been making those organizations >> better able to learn and adapt to reality. As I see it, Scrum and the Agile >> Manifesto imply something much more like the right side than the left side. >> >> The left side “works” by accommodating the existing hierarchy, making >> people comfortable, making the consultant look smart. But that isn’t >> increasing the organization’s agility. ------------------------------------ Posted by: "Alexander Kriegisch" <[email protected]> ------------------------------------ To Post a message, send it to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [email protected]