Re: Design vs. Manufacturing

"timocock <[email protected]>" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jan 2003 14:07:18 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.software-in-process
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The suggestion is that if key decision makers aren't identified, and 
given the authority to make decisions, then we get design by 
committee, groupthink and neverending discussions. That doesn't 
preclude those individuals from seeking the input of any and all 
stakeholders.

In Europe at least, a chartered engineer of any kind has the 
authority to sign off specs, designs, drawings etc. because they are 
trusted to have considered *all* the stakeholders, from designers to 
customers to users. This is done because otherwise one or other party 
does something that they think is best without considering whether 
that's what the other stakeholders want (as well as for safety 
reasons).

But I've never seen this approach taken in a software company, and 
it's my hypothesis that this is maybe why the industry suffers from 
problems such as high requirements churn, and delivering things the 
customer doesn't want.


--- In [email protected], "Kent Beck" <kent@t...> 
wrote:
> I don't. I want to encourage far more perspectives in the 
discussion of
> "requirements", both as a means to more effective resource 
allocation
> and as a political gesture to help software development bring power 
to
> everyone touched by the project instead of concentrating it in the 
hands
> of a technical elite.
>  
> Kent
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> sentto-8007113-391-1043687149-kent=threeriversinstitute.org@r...
> ps.yahoo.com
> [mailto:sentto-8007113-391-1043687149-
kent=threeriversinstitute.org@retu
> rns.groups.yahoo.com] On Behalf Of timocock <t.ocock@i...>
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 9:06 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [SIP] Re: Design vs. Manufacturing
> 
> 
> In other engineering disciplines, the amount of change is kept at a 
> manageable level by restricting sign off and requirements 
discussions 
> to the professional (or "chartered") engineers, and I think 
software 
> would certainly benefit from that


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]

 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/