Re: Re: SIP is not Takt Time
"David J. Anderson" <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Feb 2003 22:24:05 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.software-in-process |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mary, Thankyou for this - very enlightening. Throughout my own manuscript I have used "lead time" for your "cycle time". I may have to consider changing this - or perhaps just define the usage at the beginning. There is no doubt that in common usage there is some ambiguity in the use of these terms. Cheers, David >The mystery was cleared up when I pulled out the >operations >management text book I taught from a couple of years >ago (Krajewski >& Ritzman, 5th edition). Here they had a long >discussion of cycle >time which was clearly the same as takt time, and >then in a footnote >they said: >"Except in the context of line balancing, *cycle >time* has a >different meaning. It is the elapsed time between >starting and >completing a job. Some researchers and >practitioners prefer to use >the term *lead time*." >SO! Cycle time has TWO commonly used meanings Eone >takt time and >one equivalent to time-in-queue. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get 128 Bit SSL Encryption! http://us.click.yahoo.com/LIgTpC/vN2EAA/xGHJAA/NhFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/