Re: Unit tests and parameter validation

Michal Svoboda <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.test-driven-development
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Eb wrote:
>  Curious how if this changes if one develops inside out. 

Your probability increases that you develop the wrong thing. :)

On the original point, if your guards are mostly about null, then you
can annotate your stuff with @Nonnull (or similar if your language
supports it). This then makes the contract more like a strong type
system and violations can be likely caught by static analysis tools.

Michal
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.