Re: Unit tests and parameter validation

How so?


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Michal Svoboda <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Eb wrote:
> > Curious how if this changes if one develops inside out.
>
> Your probability increases that you develop the wrong thing. :)
>
> On the original point, if your guards are mostly about null, then you
> can annotate your stuff with @Nonnull (or similar if your language
> supports it). This then makes the contract more like a strong type
> system and violations can be likely caught by static analysis tools.
>
> Michal
>
>  
>



-- 
blog: http://eikonne.wordpress.com
twitter: @eikonne