Re: [testdrivendevelopment] "I think the community needs more explicit direction...."
"Hassan Schroeder" <[email protected]> Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:14:08 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.test-driven-development |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CACmC4yAQrtwOAPLqZ6iQwNntZnTF=2X-svFsKK6_O9VP+sgEZQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 1:40 PM Charles Gallo <[email protected]> wrote= : > Place after place I=E2=80=99ve been in has a small to mid sized collecti= on of tests, that are either not maintained, not run, or not added to, and = when you do start adding, management complains. > I=E2=80=99ve never been to a place that does more than pay lip service Ouch, that sucks. I'm part of a smallish team, but we deploy via CI/CD and if any of the test suite, code coverage minimum, linter, or typespec checker fails, it doesn't go out. We reject PRs for not having adequate tests, and recognize people for expanding coverage of existing code. My condolences on your past employment situations :-) --=20 Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ [email protected] twitter: @hassan Consulting Availability : Silicon Valley or remote -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#35747): https://groups.io/g/testdrivendevelopment/mess= age/35747 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/61850834/3268755 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/testdrivendevelopment/leave/6156322/74455= 6386/xyzzy [[email protected]] -=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-