Re: Using scons as setup.py
Daniel Holth <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG8k2+4_bOe=-jar3HtrJ3iUBudxn9omRiCUOYJZZt=F3FBkjA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thought that didn't matter anymore with shared key dicts. I'll ask on users. On Sat, Jun 4, 2016, 10:55 Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> wrote: > The move to slots decreased memory footprint and runtime. > > I thought other's had scons >2.4.0 running in pypy without having to muck > with slots. > You might ask in users mailing list > > -Bill > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Daniel Holth <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am working on doing some experiments using scons as the setup.py >> implementation. I want to be able to package wheel files more flexibly than >> setuptools would allow, and it's nice to have a good, easier to use build >> system. A new pip feature will allow dependencies before setup.py is called. >> >> Had to find/replace __slots__ to __slats__ to get it to run in pypy. How >> badly do you need slots? >> >> Daniel Holth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev