Re: Using scons as setup.py
Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyG4CE9hk0bCj_o3n28_P7eT-b8kmmT=VsV9THXL9MYVNLTAA@mail.gmail.com> |
Shared key dicts? I know with python 2.7 it made non-trivial memory and speed differences. On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Daniel Holth <[email protected]> wrote: > Thought that didn't matter anymore with shared key dicts. I'll ask on > users. > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016, 10:55 Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> The move to slots decreased memory footprint and runtime. >> >> I thought other's had scons >2.4.0 running in pypy without having to muck >> with slots. >> You might ask in users mailing list >> >> -Bill >> >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Daniel Holth <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I am working on doing some experiments using scons as the setup.py >>> implementation. I want to be able to package wheel files more flexibly than >>> setuptools would allow, and it's nice to have a good, easier to use build >>> system. A new pip feature will allow dependencies before setup.py is called. >>> >>> Had to find/replace __slots__ to __slats__ to get it to run in pypy. How >>> badly do you need slots? >>> >>> Daniel Holth >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev