Re: SCons COM vs COMSTR tests

Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel
Message-ID <CAEyG4CF1p719PCao-Wn3GcRmLM4o+8HBj2Jdrx__NW92nDjFmg@mail.gmail.com>
William,

I think I disagree.
The ability to set one different from the other should work and should be
tested.

Though, this really comes from the Action Object..

I think ideally we'd be able to easily separate running unit tests from the
system tests. (Though you can do that by specifying which parent directory
now).

-Bill

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:15 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Team,
>
> I was looking at some tests and they seems to overlap in such a way that 1
> is subsumed by the other.
>
> For example, test/Java/RMICOM.py and test/Java/RMICOMSTR.py are identical
> except that one sets only the RMICOM variable and the other sets both
> RMICOM and RMICOMSTR (which of course means that one has extra stuff in the
> stdout). It seems to me that RMICOMSTR subsumes the other, and only 1 test
> has value.
>
> Having a lean test harness is a bonus. Tests take a long time to run
> (especially if we are running redundant ones).
>
> V/R,
> William
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>

_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.