Re: SCons COM vs COMSTR tests
William Blevins <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALJHx13AivE2oDJtkGhmsTB=O=odCQTsdFo9A38qa1yAadKK0A@mail.gmail.com> |
Fair enough. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Bill Deegan <bill-cJFiu+DHMVC5azolltMz9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> wrote: > William, > > I think I disagree. > The ability to set one different from the other should work and should be > tested. > > Though, this really comes from the Action Object.. > > I think ideally we'd be able to easily separate running unit tests from > the system tests. (Though you can do that by specifying which parent > directory now). > > -Bill > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:15 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Team, >> >> I was looking at some tests and they seems to overlap in such a way that >> 1 is subsumed by the other. >> >> For example, test/Java/RMICOM.py and test/Java/RMICOMSTR.py are identical >> except that one sets only the RMICOM variable and the other sets both >> RMICOM and RMICOMSTR (which of course means that one has extra stuff in the >> stdout). It seems to me that RMICOMSTR subsumes the other, and only 1 test >> has value. >> >> Having a lean test harness is a bonus. Tests take a long time to run >> (especially if we are running redundant ones). >> >> V/R, >> William >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev