Re: Scons 4.2.0 and Python 3.10: tes t SCons/ActionTests.py failed

Thanks all for reply!
 
I created an issue on Scons github page:
https://github.com/SCons/scons/issues/4074
 
  
>Пятница, 17 декабря 2021, 22:00 +03:00 от Bill Deegan <[email protected]>:
> 
>Sergey,
> 
>You can ignore this failure for the time being with the following caveat
>* - If you build with python 3.10 and then build again with python 3.10.1 you will likely see unnecessary rebuilds
> 
>Otherwise if you're just building with SCons and staying with the same version of python 3.10..1 or 3.10, scons should do the "right thing"
> 
>The test which is failing is in the logic which SCons uses to determine in a python action function or object has changed between builds.
>We generate a signature of such and store that in the sconsign (as we do for regular source files, or build strings) and compare those when rebuilding.
> 
>Please file an issue in Github for this?
>We'll try to address this in the next release.
> 
>Thanks,
>Bill  
>On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:01 AM Mats Wichmann < [email protected] > wrote:
>>On 12/17/21 02:23, Sergey Torokhov via Scons-users wrote:
>>> I downgrade Python from 3.10.1 to 3.10 and this test is OK.
>>>
>>> Are there many other places in Scons where it could affect?
>>
>>no, they're all contained in one file.  I've been updating these as we
>>go along, had no idea there would be a change for 3.10.1.  Don't recall
>>any time Python has changed these in a bugfix ("micro") version..... sigh.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Scons-users mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>_______________________________________________
>Scons-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users 
 
 
 
 

_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users