Re: Scons 4.2.0 and Python 3.10: test SCons/ActionTests.py failed
Bill Deegan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.programming.tools.scons.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEyG4CHmfeUeHTnM9e3bRZP-9yZ0jc2qmtFvmPAicJhe=Cw7BA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks for finding the issue and filing it! On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 2:26 PM Sergey Torokhov via Scons-users < [email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks all for reply! > > I created an issue on Scons github page: > https://github.com/SCons/scons/issues/4074 > > > > Пятница, 17 декабря 2021, 22:00 +03:00 от Bill Deegan < > [email protected]>: > > Sergey, > > You can ignore this failure for the time being with the following caveat > * - If you build with python 3.10 and then build again with python 3.10.1 > you will likely see unnecessary rebuilds > > Otherwise if you're just building with SCons and staying with the same > version of python 3.10..1 or 3.10, scons should do the "right thing" > > The test which is failing is in the logic which SCons uses to determine in > a python action function or object has changed between builds. > We generate a signature of such and store that in the sconsign (as we do > for regular source files, or build strings) and compare those when > rebuilding. > > Please file an issue in Github for this? > We'll try to address this in the next release. > > Thanks, > Bill > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 10:01 AM Mats Wichmann <[email protected] > <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 12/17/21 02:23, Sergey Torokhov via Scons-users wrote: > > I downgrade Python from 3.10.1 to 3.10 and this test is OK. > > > > Are there many other places in Scons where it could affect? > > no, they're all contained in one file. I've been updating these as we > go along, had no idea there would be a change for 3.10.1. Don't recall > any time Python has changed these in a bugfix ("micro") version..... sigh.. > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] > <//e.mail.ru/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aScons%[email protected]> > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] <http:///compose?To=Scons%[email protected]> > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users > _______________________________________________ Scons-users mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users