Re: Status report
Magnus Lie Hetland <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:03:39 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.anygui.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(Warning: Sort of non-informative post ahead ;) Patrick K. O'Brien <[email protected]>: > > On Thursday 24 October 2002 09:57 am, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > > It seems that my attempt at rallying the troops failed a bit... :} > > Sorry. I've just been to busy to get to this. I see. I guess we're all quite busy at the moment, so we probably shouldn't expect the release schedule to pick up much speed any time soon. But I'll try to keep things moving nonetheless, even if it moves at a slow pace. > And, unfortunately, I don't know when I'll have time for it. OK. > Of course, if someone wanted to pay me to write an article about it, > that would help. ;-) And I guess articles about it would be more interesting when it's in a better working shape, eh? ;) Joseph A Knapka <[email protected]>: > > Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > > It seems that my attempt at rallying the troops failed a bit... :} > > I apologize. No need. > I have been very busy with a number of things. I've > been trying to make time for Anygui, but since my flurry of > backend-updating back in June or so, I just haven't been able > to do much I haven't been able to do that much myself. Somehow it may be a pity that we didn't move forward at a greater pace to begin with (e.g. drop the rewrite of the internals) so we could "settle back" (as it seems we're doing) in a more maintainable state... But even so, I think the rewrites have been worth it, and if we can get to 0.2 final, I'm not all too worried about toning down the pace (or keeping at its current level ;) > (my claim of 8 available hours/week was vaporware). > > > If someone (Joe?) could test textgui and cursesgui I would appreciate > > it -- I don't really remember the details of how to use them :] > > I will try to get to it this weekend. Wonderful. > I also have a plan to implement > menus for txtgui, but I can't say when that will happen. No real rush for this yet. > -- Joe Matthew Schinckel <[email protected]>: > > on 25/10/02 1:27 AM, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > > > It seems that my attempt at rallying the troops failed a bit... :} > > Hmm, lazy troops, I guess (me included). ... or very busy. I really do understand that you (we) all are busy, and I don't expect you (us) to do more than we have the time for. So if you don't have to do the things I ask for/suggest, that's fine. > > definite possibility, I think. I won't be able to test beosgui, but > > from what I understand it is quite broken anyway, and probably won't > > be a part of 0.2a0. > > Correct. Check. > I don't see getting beosgui going anytime soon. I haven't sorted > out my hardware problems, and getting a new PC is looking like 6 > months or so off. Right. I guess putting beosgui on ice won't be too much of a problem; I suspect there aren't too many BeOS users of Anygui yet anyway ;) > Plus, I've been really busy with other stuff lately. [snip] > Matt. -- Magnus Lie Hetland Practical Python The Anygui Project http://hetland.org http://ppython.com http://anygui.org ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event to be fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com