Re: OK, everyone...
Matthew Schinckel <[email protected]> Fri, 20 Feb 2004 17:55:47 +1030
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.anygui.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/02/2004, at 10:33 AM, Greg Ewing wrote: > Magnus: > >> But I keep getting emails from people who say that Anygui is a >> "Good Idea(tm)" > > Perhaps those are the people who want an API that's small, simple and > Pythonic, as opposed to big, complicated and warped in the direction > of some other language such as C++ or Tcl. > > That's the goal of my own Python GUI project (which I *am* still > working on, by the way, despite appearances to the contrary!). > > My goals aren't quite the same as AnyGUI's, because I only intend to > provide *one* implementation for each platform, preferably built as > directly as possible on whatever is provided natively, so that users > don't have to install any extra packages. > yeah, I agree about having an (extremely) simple UI interface (and I mean that, a User Interface Interface!), and I actually, as a basis for Anygui/beosgui wrote a wrapper around each of the BeOS API classes, doing things like giving them decent defaults, and subclassing them (rather, superclassing them, I suppose). It actually meant I could write a GUI wrapper for a program with about 5 lines, including window, buttons, textbox, labels/textareas. (maybe a slight exaggeration, but the programming was the main bit, not the gui coding). Now, if I can see if I can find the simplegui.py files I created in a backup somewhere, since I wiped clean all of the hard disks connected to my old mac in order to try and sell her... Matt. -- Matt Schinckel <[email protected]> ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click