Re: Changing run_tests.py (Galaxy package inspired)

Vincent Davis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.bio.devel
Message-ID <CALyJZZVMGZDad141ur=H5-LiDSwLjPhLq+75zEEWAGUT8N-zOw@mail.gmail.com>
I think it would be nice if all the external dependency checks were in an
external module that could be used by a user.
A user might what to;

   - Make sure Biopython can find the external app and help diagnose
   problems.
   - Check which version of the external app Biopython is using
   - Might help with "modular installation"
   https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/349


Vincent Davis
720-301-3003

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Tiago Rodrigues Antao <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Regarding free vs non-free dependencies, I would suggest marking
> dependencies without a license as non-free.
>
> Tiago
>
>
> On Tue, 10 May 2016, Tiago Rodrigues Antao wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, 10 May 2016, Peter Cock wrote:
>>
>> I like this idea - I guess we'd need a subclass of the missing dependency
>>> exception specifically for missing a proprietary extension?
>>>
>>
>> That would work.
>> Also, change run_tests and add two options, say:
>> --check-dependencies
>> --check-free-dependencies
>>
>> I can work on a PR along these lines...
>> _______________________________________________
>> Biopython-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Biopython-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev
>

_______________________________________________
Biopython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.