Re: Changing run_tests.py (Galaxy package inspired)
Vincent Davis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALyJZZVMGZDad141ur=H5-LiDSwLjPhLq+75zEEWAGUT8N-zOw@mail.gmail.com> |
I think it would be nice if all the external dependency checks were in an external module that could be used by a user. A user might what to; - Make sure Biopython can find the external app and help diagnose problems. - Check which version of the external app Biopython is using - Might help with "modular installation" https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/349 Vincent Davis 720-301-3003 On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Tiago Rodrigues Antao <[email protected]> wrote: > Regarding free vs non-free dependencies, I would suggest marking > dependencies without a license as non-free. > > Tiago > > > On Tue, 10 May 2016, Tiago Rodrigues Antao wrote: > > >> >> On Tue, 10 May 2016, Peter Cock wrote: >> >> I like this idea - I guess we'd need a subclass of the missing dependency >>> exception specifically for missing a proprietary extension? >>> >> >> That would work. >> Also, change run_tests and add two options, say: >> --check-dependencies >> --check-free-dependencies >> >> I can work on a PR along these lines... >> _______________________________________________ >> Biopython-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ > Biopython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev > _______________________________________________ Biopython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython-dev