Re: [Biopython] Fwd: Your abstract (11) has been accepted for a short talk at BOSC 2020!
Peter Cock <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jul 2020 00:52:09 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAKVJ-_68dF1HsA_mT8q6EymhscKA8apbM9HRG9HF=-zzE9WVQw@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks Dave - didn't expect to see you here ;) I'll get the talk slides recorded first, and then we can fix up the abstract accordingly. Kind regards, Peter On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 9:48 PM Dave Clements <[email protected]> wrote: > HI Michael, > > Send me an updated PDF, and I can update the bcc2020.sched.com site. > > Cheers, > Dave C > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 6:00 PM Peter Cock <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> Unfortunately I missed the official window to update the abstract, too >> much going on with COVID-19 lockdown etc. But I could ask the rest of the >> committee nicely? >> >> Right now though, I need to finish the slides this weekend ready to >> submit a recorded video version on Monday 6 July. The most practical way to >> do that seems to be with Microsoft Powerpoint (I know how to record audio >> for each slide, do the timings, and export a video). >> >> If you want to see the current draft, please email me (off list is fine). >> I'll send a copy directly now to a few people whose work is specifically >> mentioned, >> >> Thanks all, >> >> Peter >> >> On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 6:10 AM Michiel de Hoon <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> For novel functionality (see the first reviewer) you could point to the >>> new pairwise sequence aligner in Biopython. It is as fast as aligners >>> implemented as standalone (C/C++) programs, maybe even faster if you want >>> to align many sequences, but much more flexible. I don't know of any >>> existing programs that offer this speed and flexibility. >>> >>> Best, >>> -Michiel >>> >>> On Sunday, June 7, 2020, 9:16:22 PM GMT+9, Peter Cock < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Good news: The abstract was accepted for a lightning talk, and we have >>> the opportunity to improve the abstract (see reviews below). >>> >>> Specifically I think we should add something about the alphabet changes >>> underway on GitHub (which in hindsight I wish we'd drawn more attention to >>> in the NEWS file for Biopython 1.78). Quoting the DEPRECATED file, >>> >>> "The design of Bio.Aphabet included a number of historic design choices >>> which, with the benefit of hindsight, were regretable. While the details >>> remain to be agreed, we intend to remove or replace Bio.Alphabet in 2020." >>> >>> GMail has just flagged that regrettable was misspelt. Opps. >>> >>> The BOSC/BCC 20202 abstract is here: >>> >>> https://github.com/biopython/talks/tree/master/2020_BOSC/abstract >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> Biopython mailing list - [email protected] >> https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython > > > > -- > https://galaxyproject.org/ > _______________________________________________ Biopython mailing list - [email protected] https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython