Re: [Biopython] Fwd: Your abstract (11) has been accepted for a short talk at BOSC 2020!
Dave Clements <[email protected]> Sun, 5 Jul 2020 13:47:36 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.bio.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+He-X8j1t-+ykXfruuroOdo35cvVOavL8zP4yQpRjqNdoA4Vg@mail.gmail.com> |
HI Michael, Send me an updated PDF, and I can update the bcc2020.sched.com site. Cheers, Dave C On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 6:00 PM Peter Cock <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > Unfortunately I missed the official window to update the abstract, too > much going on with COVID-19 lockdown etc. But I could ask the rest of the > committee nicely? > > Right now though, I need to finish the slides this weekend ready to submit > a recorded video version on Monday 6 July. The most practical way to do > that seems to be with Microsoft Powerpoint (I know how to record audio for > each slide, do the timings, and export a video). > > If you want to see the current draft, please email me (off list is fine). > I'll send a copy directly now to a few people whose work is specifically > mentioned, > > Thanks all, > > Peter > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 6:10 AM Michiel de Hoon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> For novel functionality (see the first reviewer) you could point to the >> new pairwise sequence aligner in Biopython. It is as fast as aligners >> implemented as standalone (C/C++) programs, maybe even faster if you want >> to align many sequences, but much more flexible. I don't know of any >> existing programs that offer this speed and flexibility. >> >> Best, >> -Michiel >> >> On Sunday, June 7, 2020, 9:16:22 PM GMT+9, Peter Cock < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Good news: The abstract was accepted for a lightning talk, and we have >> the opportunity to improve the abstract (see reviews below). >> >> Specifically I think we should add something about the alphabet changes >> underway on GitHub (which in hindsight I wish we'd drawn more attention to >> in the NEWS file for Biopython 1.78). Quoting the DEPRECATED file, >> >> "The design of Bio.Aphabet included a number of historic design choices >> which, with the benefit of hindsight, were regretable. While the details >> remain to be agreed, we intend to remove or replace Bio.Alphabet in 2020." >> >> GMail has just flagged that regrettable was misspelt. Opps. >> >> The BOSC/BCC 20202 abstract is here: >> >> https://github.com/biopython/talks/tree/master/2020_BOSC/abstract >> >> Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ > Biopython mailing list - [email protected] > https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython -- https://galaxyproject.org/ _______________________________________________ Biopython mailing list - [email protected] https://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython