Re: About website, docs etc.
Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:41:22 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.db.psycopg.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17/02/2010 11:29, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: > Hello, > > the last couple of week has been full of events: license change, new > documentation, and if you haven't noticed yet, the homepage at > http://initd.org/ is no more unwelcoming as it has been in the last > couple of years (well, in case you miss it, the rant is still > reachable at /down.html...) Eh eh. > Well, the homepage is not in a 2.0 bells and whistles style. ...it > also looks suspiciously similar to the documentation... but you know, > once you have an hammer... You did a great work and everything's fine. We'll move some more projects to initd.org in the future and the homepage will probably go back to its original, pre-2k layout. But right now it is *perfect*. > - Which are the critical informations missing from the webpage? Or > also less critical but you'd like to see addressed? I leave this one to psycopg's users. > - I'd say we definitely need a FAQ section where to provide direct > solution to the gotchas a new user may find. I am not exactly a > newcomer so I may start filling it but I would surely need an hand > getting back in a newcomer's shoes. Can you help me to find the "right > questions"? Somebody has mentioned a previously existing FAQ: is it > still available/useful? Not very much. I'd like to have the FAQ in rst format in the original distribution, if it is possible. > - For the previous point, probably a collaborative area would be the > best tool. Probably nobody of us is willing to set up a complete wiki > and start fighting the spam, so I'd say we could borrow a page from > Python's or PG's wiki and write it there. They have recently set up > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Psycopg : we may fill a FAQ section > here. What do you think? I agree but see above. I think having all documentation togheter with the source code is a big plus and makes easy the work of packages. [snip of pizza and mandolino] > If you'd like to contribute material to the website or to the > documentation, once in a lifetime I feel saying just give me/us the > idea and I'll be glad to add it (I do because I know there is not much > work left after all). But, in case you feel like writing a page, or a > css, or fixing something, you can grab everything from the branches > "website" and "docs" on http://piro.develer.com/psycopg2.git and shout > when you have something to pull (gitweb is here [1] if you want to > peek). Is the website branch very different from the python2 branch? If they diverged too much maybe it is better to setup a different repository else I'd like to fold it into the original branch. federico -- Federico Di Gregorio fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected] A desobediência é uma virtude necessária à criatividade. -- Raul Seixas _______________________________________________ Psycopg mailing list Psycopg-IAPFreCvJWPBWskQ1e/[email protected] http://lists.initd.org/mailman/listinfo/psycopg
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 262 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkt7x9IACgkQvcCgrgZGjeuyFACgl+LJWc/AR+0sLzsvV6gOfqkh W7MAoM6T26yo0maBAO9cNUftV8Pdd6ji =yF63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----