Re: About website, docs etc.

Daniele Varrazzo <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:13:04 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.db.psycopg.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Federico Di Gregorio <fog-NGVKUo/i/[email protected]> wrote:

> Is the website branch very different from the python2 branch? If they
> diverged too much maybe it is better to setup a different repository
> else I'd like to fold it into the original branch.

It is actually just a separate directory, so there is actually no
point in having it in the psycopg codebase at all. Because I don't
want to clutter the package history with the commit website I would
avoid to merge it. I think the best option is to have a repo on itself
and have it accessible from git://luna.dndg.it/.


> Not very much. I'd like to have the FAQ in rst format in the original
> distribution, if it is possible.

Of course it is: the faq can be a manual section. Here the same point:
my main concern was about avoiding too many commits in the codebase
not directly pertaining to the module, but having them packaged in the
distribution seems actually a good thing to have.


-- Daniele