Re: Opinions on requiring younger glibc in manylinux1 wheel?
Trishank Kuppusamy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAEd-exOfCE6qUG-+u32i0bkAZZLdmFXxC-jRMkQM-UP-H5afGw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:59 AM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not really familiar with manylinux1, but I'd be concerned if we > started getting bug reports on pip because we installed a library that > claimed to be manylinux1 and was failing because it wasn't. (And yes, > packaging errors like this are a common source of pip bug reports). > > It seems to me that it's defeating the purpose of having standards if > people aren't willing to follow them... > I agree with you. However, if people are using this on a private index, then I guess the onus is on them. I'm not married to this idea, though! -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7T7KX7BINDCHQSETDJ3VBDWIE5BEG3YT/