Re: Opinions on requiring younger glibc in manylinux1 wheel?
"Antoine Pitrou" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.distutils.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Moore wrote: > I'm not really familiar with manylinux1, but I'd be concerned if we > started getting bug reports on pip because we installed a library that > claimed to be manylinux1 and was failing because it wasn't. (And yes, > packaging errors like this are a common source of pip bug reports). > > It seems to me that it's defeating the purpose of having standards if > people aren't willing to follow them... I agree with that. OTOH it seems providing binary wheels is generally a strong demand from the community. I would be fine with only providing conda packages myself. By the way other packages are already doing worse: https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/8802 Regards Antoine. -- Distutils-SIG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/distutils-sig.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/mm3/archives/list/[email protected]/message/S6WYTY7NAGODRAOEC6QOBNG5I7AOIVAT/