Re: Interfaces in hierarchcal way
Martin Strubel <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.myhdl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi guys, > > We already talked about that, and yes you can't create parametrizable > systems with Qsys. > ... > I have been contemplating on abandoning Qsys, but then I need a good > alternative for connecting those master and slave interfaces together. > Having a deja vu here... I've found all the SOPC/Qsys and their Xilinx/Lattice counterparts not really friendly for maintenance, so I've ended up with an approach based on GNU make, kconfig (linux kernel config) and an XML device description (called DClib/devdesc). Like IP-XACT, but way less complex. Could be enhanced to spit out MyHDL (currently, it can only generate VHDL based Wishbone-capable SoCs). There's also a graphical tool called "kactus2", but I haven't looked at it in detail. The XML approach turned out to be quite robust and future compatible, unlike the known migration nightmares that make you freeze old software versions in a VM... Once hierarchy can be maintained in MyHDL, this might become very interesting, due to a vast amount of powerful XML processing tools in the Python domain. Greetings, - Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/