Re: Proposal review interface

Please submit a ticket to the [email protected]. 

-aj

Am 10.03.2014 um 23:54 schrieb Christopher Arndt <[email protected]>:

> I just got approved as a proposal reviewer and had a look at the list of
> proposals awaiting review. I noticed two things:
> 
> - I can't see the contents of the "Notes" field in the submission form
> for proposals listed anywhere. Since this was advertised especially as
> an opportunity to pass explanatory remarks to the reviewers, this
> omission is very unfortunate.
> 
> - I'm fairly certain that in the form to submit training proposals the
> first two text areas were labelled "Structure" and "Description" instead
> of "Abstract" and "Description" and they were in reverse order.
> 
> The result is that training proposals now contain a narrative of the
> structure in the abstract field, where reviewers would probably would
> expect a short description of (the topics of) the training, seeing that
> the section is labelled "Abstract" and is listed first.
> 
> 
> Can we please make the contents of the "Notes" field visible to the
> reviewers?
> 
> Can we label the sections in the reviewer view the same as they were
> labelled in the submission form?
> 
> Can we make sure that for trainings the right text ends up in the
> conference program (i.e. the contents of the "Description" field)?
> 
> 
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
> EuroPython mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython

_______________________________________________
EuroPython 2014  Berlin, 21th27th July
EuroPython mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython