Re: Proposal review interface

Markus Holtermann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.org.europe
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Chris,

I'm the webteam lead for the EuroPython 2014.

First of all, thank you for your input and comments. The issues you
describe are perfectly valid, so I created 2 issues in our issue tracker
at https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:54:45PM +0100, Christopher Arndt wrote:
>- I can't see the contents of the "Notes" field in the submission form
>for proposals listed anywhere. Since this was advertised especially as
>an opportunity to pass explanatory remarks to the reviewers, this
>omission is very unfortunate.
>
>- I'm fairly certain that in the form to submit training proposals the
>first two text areas were labelled "Structure" and "Description" instead
>of "Abstract" and "Description" and they were in reverse order.
>
>The result is that training proposals now contain a narrative of the
>structure in the abstract field, where reviewers would probably would
>expect a short description of (the topics of) the training, seeing that
>the section is labelled "Abstract" and is listed first.
>
>
>Can we please make the contents of the "Notes" field visible to the
>reviewers?

https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/82

>Can we label the sections in the reviewer view the same as they were
>labelled in the submission form?

https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/83

>Can we make sure that for trainings the right text ends up in the
>conference program (i.e. the contents of the "Description" field)?

Well, as the fields in the proposal view are correctly labeled
(structure has the annotation about the time frames), it is first up to
the proposal author to put the description and the abstract/structure in
the correct fields. Second, the once the schedule is launched and before
the conference program is printed, we will of course try to make sure to
always include the correct text. Apart from that, the abstract /
structure field in the review's proposal update form lacks the
annotation about the time frames. Hence I created yet another issue:
https://github.com/EuroPython/djep/issues/84

Bottom line, we will fix those issues asap. But if someone on this mailing
list wants to contribute, fee free to comment on the issue and let us
know and submit a pull request.

Best,

Markus Holtermann

(EuroPython 2014 Webteam Lead)

--

EuroPython 2014 - The European Python Conference in Berlin
21-27 July 2014 at bcc Berlin Congress Center
Meet with the Python community: tutorials, talks, sprints and socializing
https://ep2014.europython.eu - @europython on Twitter

_______________________________________________
EuroPython 2014 – Berlin, 21th–27th July
EuroPython mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/europython
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=7icc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.