Re: RulesDispatch/PEAK-Rules

At 09:18 PM 10/6/2008 +0530, Rajeev J Sebastian wrote:
>I want to have arbitrary conditions on the function arguments, but the
>http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/RulesReadme page suggests that
>this is not yet possible in PEAK Rules ...

It's out of date.  Sorry about that.  I've just updated it now from 
the README.txt in SVN.


>Is there any listing of the currently available features of PEAK-Rules ?

Not really, but it can now do pretty much anything that RuleDispatch 
does, as long as you don't need PyProtocols support.  It also has 
extensive internal documentation (see the .txt files in the source) 
and the beginnings of some user documentation.


>Should I be using RuleDispatch instead ?

Definitely not.  See:

http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/RulesReadme#porting-code-from-ruledispatch