Re: RulesDispatch/PEAK-Rules
"Rajeev J Sebastian" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.peak |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the updates Philip. Regards Rajeev J Sebastian On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Phillip J. Eby <pje-Wh6+Hckhi6HFNGf7iClzIwC/[email protected]> wrote: > At 09:18 PM 10/6/2008 +0530, Rajeev J Sebastian wrote: >> >> I want to have arbitrary conditions on the function arguments, but the >> http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/RulesReadme page suggests that >> this is not yet possible in PEAK Rules ... > > It's out of date. Sorry about that. I've just updated it now from the > README.txt in SVN. > > >> Is there any listing of the currently available features of PEAK-Rules ? > > Not really, but it can now do pretty much anything that RuleDispatch does, > as long as you don't need PyProtocols support. It also has extensive > internal documentation (see the .txt files in the source) and the beginnings > of some user documentation. > > >> Should I be using RuleDispatch instead ? > > Definitely not. See: > > http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/RulesReadme#porting-code-from-ruledispatch > >