Re: time for a new release

Matti Picus <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.pypy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 9/10/20 1:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> So far I and the Fedora maintainer were able to independently backport
> one vulnerability that clearly applied (the tarfile one) but we weren't
> able to get a clear match of any other Python 3.x fixes to 2.7 codebase.
>   Well, until today when thanks to you I've noticed that http.request
> code has a vulnerable match in httplib.
>
> But this all is lots of work, and I'm really supposed to be doing
> something else right now.  I'm trying my best but I'm not sure if I can
> manage to fix several months of negligence in two days.


Thanks for all you are doing. The release deadline is only a motivator 
for now since we could do another much smaller release next month if needed.

I want to move toward python3.7 as soon as possible since the scientific 
python stack's stated python version policy means 3.6 will no longer be 
expressly supported especially after 3.9 comes out.

Matti
_______________________________________________
pypy-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.