gmane.comp.python.pypy

16649 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: A new build-summary.pypy.org service and benchmark runner benchmarker2
Mon, 01 Jun 2026 13:53:07 +0200
Jacob Hallén <[email protected]> • #16774
A new build-summary.pypy.org service and benchmark runner benchmarker2
Mon, 1 Jun 2026 09:40:48 +0300
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16773
PyPy 7.3.23 release
Wed, 27 May 2026 10:34:20 +0300
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16772
PyPy v7.3.22 is out
Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:31:18 +0300
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16771
Re: PyPy v7.3.21 has been released
Thu, 19 Mar 2026 16:25:07 +0100
Simon Cross via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16770
PyPy v7.3.21 has been released
Fri, 13 Mar 2026 12:52:42 +0200
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16769
Interest in helping out.
Wed, 11 Mar 2026 02:46:06 +0000
chris ivanov via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16768
Re: I want to further develop the project as it's last update from 2017
Mon, 12 Jan 2026 02:03:33 +0600
Umor faruk suptoo via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16767
Re: I want to further develop the project as it's last update from 2017
Mon, 12 Jan 2026 06:54:29 +1100
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16766
I want to further develop the project as it's last update from 2017
Sun, 11 Jan 2026 17:43:18 +0600
Umor faruk suptoo via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16765
Re: RPython page on PyPI with wrong link
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:45:46 +0300
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16764
RPython page on PyPI with wrong link
Fri, 17 Oct 2025 01:17:08 +0000
Felipe Maia via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16763
Re: Faster PyPy build
Thu, 11 Sep 2025 07:39:38 +0200
Maciej Fijalkowski via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16762
Re: regex is much slower in pypy than cpython
Wed, 03 Sep 2025 06:15:40 +0200
Michał Górny <[email protected]> • #16761
Re: regex is much slower in pypy than cpython
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 07:23:06 +0300
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16760
regex is much slower in pypy than cpython
Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:16:52 +0800
Li Li via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16759
Faster PyPy build
Mon, 21 Jul 2025 15:31:31 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16758
Re: PyPy v7.3.20 was released
Sat, 5 Jul 2025 00:25:34 +0200
Simon Cross via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16757
PyPy v7.3.20 was released
Fri, 4 Jul 2025 17:29:46 +0300
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16756
Re: [hpy-dev] Re: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:28:06 +0300
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16755
Re: [hpy-dev] Re: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Fri, 6 Jun 2025 11:39:24 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16754
Re: [hpy-dev] Re: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Thu, 5 Jun 2025 09:53:42 +0200
CF Bolz-Tereick via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16753
Re: [hpy-dev] Re: Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Wed, 4 Jun 2025 01:44:05 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16752
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Sun, 18 May 2025 13:28:44 +0200
Marcus Harnisch <[email protected]> • #16751
Re: Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Thu, 15 May 2025 15:41:52 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER via NumPy-Discussion <[email protected]> • #16750
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Wed, 07 May 2025 11:55:43 -0000
Techran CO via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16749
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Tue, 6 May 2025 14:23:13 +0200
CF Bolz-Tereick via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16748
Re: Question about ref counting and non-movable objects
Mon, 5 May 2025 23:03:11 +0200
Simon Cross via hpy-dev <[email protected]> • #16747
Question about ref counting and non-movable objects
Mon, 5 May 2025 17:57:33 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER via hpy-dev <[email protected]> • #16746
Re: [pypy-dev] Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Mon, 5 May 2025 15:32:19 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER via hpy-dev <[email protected]> • #16745
Re: [pypy-dev] Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Fri, 2 May 2025 11:05:51 +0300
matti picus via hpy-dev <[email protected]> • #16744
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:24:09 +0200
Michał Górny <[email protected]> • #16743
Re: [Numpy-discussion] Re: Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:08:36 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER <[email protected]> • #16742
Re: Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Wed, 30 Apr 2025 07:32:44 +0200
Ralf Gommers via NumPy-Discussion <[email protected]> • #16741
Better compatibility of the Python scientific/data stack with fast Python interpreters
Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:20:28 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER <[email protected]> • #16740
Re: FYI: question related to HPy on discuss.python.org
Mon, 28 Apr 2025 14:35:38 +0200 (CEST)
PIERRE AUGIER <[email protected]> • #16739
Re: Are the stdlib test.regrtest supposed to pass?
Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:44:44 -0000
Liam Ellison via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16738
Re: Are the stdlib test.regrtest supposed to pass?
Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:34:41 +0100
"Yury V. Zaytsev" <[email protected]> • #16737
Re: Are the stdlib test.regrtest supposed to pass?
Tue, 04 Mar 2025 17:40:00 -0000
Jamima Tariqa via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16736
Re: Are the stdlib test.regrtest supposed to pass?
Fri, 28 Feb 2025 05:32:43 +0200
Matti Picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16735
Re: Are the stdlib test.regrtest supposed to pass?
Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:05:59 +0100
Michał Górny <[email protected]> • #16734
Are the stdlib test.regrtest supposed to pass?
Thu, 27 Feb 2025 12:00:49 +0100
Miro Hrončok <[email protected]> • #16733
Bug fix release of v7.3.19
Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:24:30 +0200
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16732
Release of v7.3.18 with python2.7, 3.10, 3.11
Thu, 6 Feb 2025 22:02:28 +1100
Matti Picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16731
Re: Users of PyPy2.7 ?
Mon, 18 Nov 2024 17:58:32 +0200
matti picus via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16730
Free-threading and PyPy ?
Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:37:54 +0100 (CET)
PIERRE AUGIER <[email protected]> • #16729
Users of PyPy2.7 ?
Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:22:34 +0100 (CET)
PIERRE AUGIER <[email protected]> • #16728
Re: Minor Bug Report for PyPy
Thu, 07 Nov 2024 16:23:10 +0100
CF Bolz-Tereick via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16727
Minor Bug Report for PyPy
Thu, 7 Nov 2024 15:24:31 +0100
Denil Bouafia via pypy-dev <[email protected]> • #16726
[Python-announce] Python Security Survey - Your Expertise Needed!
Sun, 13 Oct 2024 05:44:13 +0000
Reem Mutairy via Python-announce-list <[email protected]> • #16725