Re: tests split off from scipy package in conda-forge
Tyler Reddy <[email protected]> Sun, 28 May 2023 14:13:01 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.scientific.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHPuU_bzN_spp+5P=rp_7Tjqy6zR4h0=iPUzRY+_C_SST--mgA@mail.gmail.com> |
I think that's pretty much the same thing as removing the test sources from default distribution completely, which I'm probably -1 on, but happy to lose that debate if the majority prefer it... I just don't see the bandwidth benefit as justified for non-data assets, but I realize others disagree. On Sun, 28 May 2023 at 14:10, Ilhan Polat <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the common ground might be using python "optional dependencies" > [1] such that only interested parties install it and the rest can skip the > extra network payload. You can then install "pip/conda install scipy[full]" > or whatever the syntax might be. > > [1] : > https://setuptools.pypa.io/en/latest/userguide/dependency_management.html#optional-dependencies > > On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 10:00 PM Tyler Reddy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> FWIW, I'm in favor of moving large data assets out, but my preference >> would be to always have the sources of tests in the main repo. The debates >> about this >> aren't super interesting/fun, but anyway that's where I land on it, even >> if the project goes in another direction. >> >> Best wishes, >> Tyler >> >> On Sat, 13 May 2023 at 05:07, Ralf Gommers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This is an FYI that in conda-forge, thanks to the hard work of >>> @h-vetinari [1], the `scipy` package now no longer contains tests. Instead, >>> those are split off into a new `scipy-tests` package which, when you >>> install that, puts all the test files back inside the `scipy` package tree. >>> >>> The gain of that exercise was a ~30% size reduction, which seems worth >>> it. We already had plans to do something similar in SciPy itself, by >>> putting the heavy data files from the test suite under `scipy.datasets`. >>> The gain of that will be less, probably 15-20% of the total size of wheels >>> (excluding vendored openblas et al.). The conda-forge packages are a nice >>> test case - if we receive no complaints from that, it should be pretty safe >>> to move forward with that plan. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ralf >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/conda-forge/scipy-feedstock/pull/184 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/ >>> Member address: [email protected] >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/ >> Member address: [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ > SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/ > Member address: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/ Member address: [email protected]