Re: Deprecate `scipy.integrate.romberg`/`scipy.integrate.quadrature`?

Evgeni Burovski <[email protected]> Sun, 12 Nov 2023 08:45:28 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.scientific.devel
Message-ID <CAMRo0iujT94Fm4xzqYmkT4bNz2_3VhEsTttX60WfmA_CiCaXfQ@mail.gmail.com>
+1 for deprecating them.

вс, 12 нояб. 2023 г., 02:13 Matt Haberland <[email protected]>:

> Hi Team,
>
> `scipy.integrate.romberg` and `scipy.integrate.quadrature` do not reliably
> hit their target accuracies, and when they do, they typically require more
> function evaluations and take more wall clock time than
> `scipy.integrate.quad` (all with default settings). This is documented in
> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/18574#issuecomment-1703320598,
> which compares the accuracies, function call counts, and wall clock times
> on a benchmark set of ~800 integrals with known analytical solutions.
>
> gh-19510 (https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/19510) proposes to
> deprecate these functions, suggesting `scipy.integrate.quad` as a drop-in
> replacement. Please let us know your thoughts either here or in gh-19510!
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/
> Member address: [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/
Member address: [email protected]