Re: Deprecate `scipy.integrate.romberg`/`scipy.integrate.quadrature`?

+1 from me too.


On Sun, 12 Nov 2023 at 14:45, Evgeni Burovski <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 for deprecating them.
>
> вс, 12 нояб. 2023 г., 02:13 Matt Haberland <[email protected]>:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> `scipy.integrate.romberg` and `scipy.integrate.quadrature` do not
>> reliably hit their target accuracies, and when they do, they typically
>> require more function evaluations and take more wall clock time than
>> `scipy.integrate.quad` (all with default settings). This is documented in
>> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/18574#issuecomment-1703320598,
>> which compares the accuracies, function call counts, and wall clock times
>> on a benchmark set of ~800 integrals with known analytical solutions.
>>
>> gh-19510 (https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/19510) proposes to
>> deprecate these functions, suggesting `scipy.integrate.quad` as a drop-in
>> replacement. Please let us know your thoughts either here or in gh-19510!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>> _______________________________________________
>> SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/
>> Member address: [email protected]
>>
> _______________________________________________
> SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/
> Member address: [email protected]
>

_______________________________________________
SciPy-Dev mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/scipy-dev.python.org/
Member address: [email protected]