Re: Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)

Alice Bevan–McGregor <alice-h+KYGxXtFYrqlBn2x/[email protected]> Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:11:03 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.python.web
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said:

> Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me 
> repeat my "threat". Unless more concerns are brought up in the next 24 
> hours, can PEP 3333 be accepted? It seems a lot of people are waiting 
> for a decision that enables implementers to go ahead and claim PEP 
> 333[3] compatibility. PEP 444 can take longer.

Two hours to go...

	- Alice.


_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org