Re: Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)
Alice Bevan–McGregor <alice-h+KYGxXtFYrqlBn2x/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said: > Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me > repeat my "threat". Unless more concerns are brought up in the next 24 > hours, can PEP 3333 be accepted? It seems a lot of people are waiting > for a decision that enables implementers to go ahead and claim PEP > 333[3] compatibility. PEP 444 can take longer. With the lack of responses, can I assume this has been or will be shortly marked as "accepted"? I look forward to updating WebCore with compatibility. — Alice. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org