Re: Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)
Guido van Rossum <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.web |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Alice Bevan–McGregor <alice-h+KYGxXtFYrqlBn2x/[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011-01-10 13:12:57 -0800, Guido van Rossum said: >> >> Ok, now that we've had a week of back and forth about this, let me repeat >> my "threat". Unless more concerns are brought up in the next 24 hours, can >> PEP 3333 be accepted? It seems a lot of people are waiting for a decision >> that enables implementers to go ahead and claim PEP 333[3] compatibility. >> PEP 444 can take longer. > > With the lack of responses, can I assume this has been or will be shortly > marked as "accepted"? Yep. Phillip, can you do the honors? > I look forward to updating WebCore with compatibility. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list [email protected] Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/gcpw-web-sig%40m.gmane.org