Re: Removal of "Overwrite existing sources"

-----Original Message-----
From: Federico Fanton [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 03 November 2014 09:44
To: wxglade-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [wxGlade] Removal of "Overwrite existing sources"

>On 03/11/2014 09:48, Johan Vromans wrote:
>> On Mon, 03 Nov 2014 09:16:10 +0100
>> Federico Fanton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've just realized that - at least in the one-file-per-class scenario
>>> - overwriting sources implies that even if a Frame doesn't change,
>>> its timestamp gets updated, so source control systems think that they
>>> should commit the "modified" file...
>>
>> Modern VCS like git are contents based and do not suffer from this.
>
>Well not-so-modern ones like Subversion do :/

Sometimes it nice just to be able to scan the date stamps in a directory listing and see exactly when a file was last updated. Have I changed it since the last commit or not?
Also if automatic test systems think the file has changed could lead to unnecessary re-test.
Just a thought.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
wxGlade-general mailing list
wxGlade-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxglade-general

THIS MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR MAY BE PRIVILEGED INFORMATION, and is intended for a particular recipient(s) only.  If you have received this message by mistake please notify us by return email then delete it from your system. This message has not been encrypted. It may therefore be liable to compromise. It is your responsibility to scan this message for viruses. Viruses and compromises of security are inherent risks in relation to email. To the extent permitted by law we do not accept any liability for any virus infection and/or external compromise of security in relation to transmissions by email. Any personal views expressed in this message are not necessarily the views of Integrated System Technologies Ltd, its directors or employees. Please note that contracts may NOT be concluded
  on behalf of Integrated System Technologies Ltd by email

PATENTS:  IST considers innovation as key to LED technology development and invests heavily in R&D to keep our customers ahead of their competitors. Our growing intellectual property portfolio enables the next generation of LED lighting to occur and already has key patents granted worldwide as follows:  UK Patent No(s): 2,499,220; 2,340,215; 2,369,730; 2,408,315; 1,433,363; 0720488.6; 0814255.6; 2433091; 2,491,550 - CHINA Patent No: Int Pat App PCT/GB2009/001923, ZL200980139063.2; CN102177395A - JAPAN Patent No: 4445082 - US Patent No(s): 6,422,718; 6,963,175; 11/912 098; 12/738 750; PCT/GB2009/001923; 7 923 935, US-2011-0140633-A1; 13/351 001 - AUSTRALIA Patent No(s): 2002321596; 2009278992; 2012200252 - CZECH REPUBLIC Patent No: 1,433,363 - DENMARK Patent No: 1,433,363 - FRANCE Patent No
 : 1,433,363 - GERMANY Patent No: 602 31 418.6 - IRELAND Patent No: 1,433,363 - ITALY Patent No: 1,433,363 - LUXEMBOURG Patent No: 1,433,363 - MONACO Patent No: 1,433,363 - SWITZERLAND Patent No: 1,433,363 - THE NETHERLANDS Patent No: 1,433,363 - SWEDEN Patent No: 1,433,363 - EUROPEAN Patent Application No(s): 05735894.7; 08750475.9; 2324280; Euro Pat App 2 218 304; 12151464.0; PCT Patent Application No: PCT/GB2009/001923 - US Patent No. 8 659 237; 8 664 882

------------------------------------------------------------------------------