Re: Removal of "Overwrite existing sources"
Federico Fanton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.python.wxglade |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/11/2014 10:27, John Pote wrote: >>>> I've just realized that - at least in the one-file-per-class scenario >>>> - overwriting sources implies that even if a Frame doesn't change, >>>> its timestamp gets updated, so source control systems think that they >>>> should commit the "modified" file... >>> >>> Modern VCS like git are contents based and do not suffer from this. >> >> Well not-so-modern ones like Subversion do :/ I'm sorry, I realized I've explained myself poorly: by "timestamp" I meant that wxGlade writes a "generated by wxGlade 0.7.0 on [changing datetime]" and this is what makes Subversion think that the files should be committed. Adding an option to simply leave that alone would be perfectly fine by me :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------