Re: Removal of "Overwrite existing sources"

Federico Fanton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.wxglade
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 05/11/2014 10:27, John Pote wrote:

>>>> I've just realized that - at least in the one-file-per-class scenario
>>>> - overwriting sources implies that even if a Frame doesn't change,
>>>> its timestamp gets updated, so source control systems think that they
>>>> should commit the "modified" file...
>>>
>>> Modern VCS like git are contents based and do not suffer from this.
>>
>> Well not-so-modern ones like Subversion do :/

I'm sorry, I realized I've explained myself poorly: by "timestamp" I 
meant that wxGlade writes a
"generated by wxGlade 0.7.0 on [changing datetime]"
and this is what makes Subversion think that the files should be committed.
Adding an option to simply leave that alone would be perfectly fine by me :)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.