Re: electrical problems with Galvanic Skin Response circuit ( GSR SCL )
Stefan Jung <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.openeeg.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC3TAzMZbdzE+sQdjFijmNMK8Oxv7LiqU399ODykbwbh7P=Lrg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Steffen I don't have a clue why your circuit doesn't work. That's the fun of electronics, even a simple circuit could have 40+ reasons why it doesn't work as advertised. The fact is, a hobbyist or newbie can sometimes make elementary mistakes that an EE will just not imagine or think off. There are many, many opamps that are also rail-to-rail. You cannot use an opamp in place of a INA. For one, the INA has practically infinite input impedance. In the SCL circuit an INA is a handy device to produce (1) an easy adjustable gain, (2) subtracts the DC excitation and (3) can adjust the DC offset, should that be necessary. The result being a nice 0...5V output swing which is handy when reading with a microprocessor's internal ADC. Such internal ADC is just about always 10 bits, so you will want to use the full input voltage swing for reasonable signal resolution. I would nearly always consider it a bad design if only a limited input range is used for an ADC, as you simply waste the ADCs dynamic range/ resources. In the case of the SCL circuit you CAN replace it with a rail-to-rail opamp, but it would be a redesign of the circuit. The fact is you would need to add quite a few resistors with specific calculated values. You would need to work out the transfer function of that circuit from first principles so as to calculate the various resistors. Your circuit would need to fulfill points (1) and (2). (The DC offset (3) is not required in the SCL circuit.) If you want to adjust the working point, you would likely need to change ALL resistors. The INA just makes life much easier. You could get another INA such as a AD620, INA128, INA129, etc. and run that from say 10V. I doubt if it would work well down to zero volt. You might have to run it from a split +/- rail. You could build this for testing and comparing with the AD623. I would not use that for the proper circuit. It would complicate the power supply and you could damage the ADCs input should things go wrong. So you would have to add more components to clamp the INAs output to always stay within the ADCs input voltage. Regards Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------