Re Reverse EEG

"Nicolas Prat, PhD" <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Sep 2014 21:39:35 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.comp.science.openeeg.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The whole idea, as I see it, is pretty much a shot in the dark. It 
relies entirely on the ability of the rain to be exquisitely sensitive 
to patterns. The goal is not to reconstitute the original signal but 
rather to send back a signal of small voltage (I'm thinking around  1 to 
10 mV, milli not micro) at the points where it has been recorded. Ion 
concentrations should vary, propagate and perhaps trigger some sort of 
pattern recognition in the areas that were originally involved in the 
processing of the stimulus.
This is obviously not hard science! But then again nothing much is about 
the brain and what we really know about it at this point in time.
I prefer this idea to the magnetic stimulation route, which scares me a 
lot. Magnetic fields are not friendly to us.
Cheers!

NP--

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk