Re: nonchemical foodgrade eeg conductive gels?

Machiavelli <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:33:40 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.science.openeeg.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
The original fluid used was actually salt water, or saline. Is that not
acceptable?

On 10/18/14 9:01 AM, Tobias Gogolin wrote:
> I suppose we could say Enrico, that there are different levels of
> survival some of us are willing to tolerate... Some of us may believe
> in non contamination with potentially bioaccumulatable plastics!
> Some people eat these plastics (cooking regularly converts living food
> into plastic - no need to talk about intentionally invented
> stabilizers and conservatives etc.). Some don't even accept strange
> foreign chemicals in soaps and shampoos onto their skin!
> Some may never know the difference choice can make!
>
> I guess I will just try pure aloe first! Salt may be bad for the
> contacts right? Anyhow I do find it entertaining to discuss levels of
> survival with those tied up in the matrix ;) So keep it coming!
>
> Thanks
> Tobias
>
>
> On 10/17/14, Enrico Calore <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 10/17/2014 03:11 PM, Tobias Gogolin wrote:
>>> I am new to this field, and as I am into raw food and consciousness, I
>>> find it difficult to accept the ingredient list of conductive gels
>>> with items such as : Glycerin, Carbomer, Sodium Hydroxide, Elektrolyt,
>>> Propyiene Glycol, Benzyl Alkohol, Methylchloroisothiazolinone,
>>> Methylisothiazolinone
>>>
>>> You know as a raw foodist I hardly even use soaps anymore and no
>>> alcohol, so how can I accept these strange chemicals that have no
>>> place in nature !?
>> Nature is full of chemicals... e.g. concerning alcohol you can find
>> plenty of alcohol molecules in ripe fruits... actually "everything" in
>> nature is a chemical (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_substance).
>>
>> Just because a substance have strange name coming from latin it does not
>> mean that you can not find it in nature and moreover, also if it is the
>> case, it does not imply it is bad for your health.
>>
>>> Its like accepting poison for the benefit of consciousness? That's not
>>> very conscious the way I see it!
>> In nature you can find a lot of stuff that you may call with nicer
>> names, but is much more poisonous than the stuff that is used for EEG gels.
>>
>> ;)
>>
>> p.s.
>> If you think some of the substances contained in EEG gel is not good for
>> some reasons for human usage, you should find proofs about that...
>>
>>
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>>
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho