Re: nonchemical foodgrade eeg conductive gels?
Machiavelli <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Oct 2014 09:33:40 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.science.openeeg.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The original fluid used was actually salt water, or saline. Is that not acceptable? On 10/18/14 9:01 AM, Tobias Gogolin wrote: > I suppose we could say Enrico, that there are different levels of > survival some of us are willing to tolerate... Some of us may believe > in non contamination with potentially bioaccumulatable plastics! > Some people eat these plastics (cooking regularly converts living food > into plastic - no need to talk about intentionally invented > stabilizers and conservatives etc.). Some don't even accept strange > foreign chemicals in soaps and shampoos onto their skin! > Some may never know the difference choice can make! > > I guess I will just try pure aloe first! Salt may be bad for the > contacts right? Anyhow I do find it entertaining to discuss levels of > survival with those tied up in the matrix ;) So keep it coming! > > Thanks > Tobias > > > On 10/17/14, Enrico Calore <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 10/17/2014 03:11 PM, Tobias Gogolin wrote: >>> I am new to this field, and as I am into raw food and consciousness, I >>> find it difficult to accept the ingredient list of conductive gels >>> with items such as : Glycerin, Carbomer, Sodium Hydroxide, Elektrolyt, >>> Propyiene Glycol, Benzyl Alkohol, Methylchloroisothiazolinone, >>> Methylisothiazolinone >>> >>> You know as a raw foodist I hardly even use soaps anymore and no >>> alcohol, so how can I accept these strange chemicals that have no >>> place in nature !? >> Nature is full of chemicals... e.g. concerning alcohol you can find >> plenty of alcohol molecules in ripe fruits... actually "everything" in >> nature is a chemical (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_substance). >> >> Just because a substance have strange name coming from latin it does not >> mean that you can not find it in nature and moreover, also if it is the >> case, it does not imply it is bad for your health. >> >>> Its like accepting poison for the benefit of consciousness? That's not >>> very conscious the way I see it! >> In nature you can find a lot of stuff that you may call with nicer >> names, but is much more poisonous than the stuff that is used for EEG gels. >> >> ;) >> >> p.s. >> If you think some of the substances contained in EEG gel is not good for >> some reasons for human usage, you should find proofs about that... >> >> >> >> Enrico >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho