Re: efield vs. dpwr, field definition --> follow up on old thread

Your k point is wrong, for one thing.  Maybe you're not looking at a  
band underneath the light line.

Look at the line-defect.ctl example file included with MPB.

Alternatively, you may find it easier to rearrange things into an  
orthogonal supercell.  See:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.science.photonic-bands/1376
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.science.photonic-bands/1213

Steven (with a v)

On Dec 4, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Chad Husko wrote:

> Stephen,
> I spent a little more time with the fields and have some follow up  
> questions (on the bottom).
>
> First, some answers to yours. I will be using the proper definition  
> of the effective area as you suggest. I am sure that there is an Ex  
> field. The propagation direction is x of the PhCWG. z is the  
> vertical super cell and y is the direction of sqrt(3)*a of the air  
> holes. Attached is the CTL file.