Re: french stemmer
François-Xavier Bois <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.search.snowball |
|---|---|
| Organization | KerniX |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Martin, I fully understand your point of view. I think, like you write, that listing all the possible "errors" language by language would be great because we could perhaps find new rules/behaviours . (Moreover it would naturaly build an excpetion thesaurus). With this listing, I would be happy to try to add/modify rules for the french stemmer. Thank you for your wonderful work. François-Xavier BOIS KerniX Software 15, rue Cels 75014 PARIS [email protected] tel : 01 53 98 73 43 Le 17/02/2011 09:27, Martin Porter a écrit : > Dear Fracois-Xavier, > > Yes, I saw the post, was not sure how to reply, and so procrastinated. (I > was intending to write quite a long note.) But your reminder prompts me to > say something. > > There is, as you probably know, an English stemmer, which is (or is supposed > to be) an improvement on the original Porter stemmer. The reason I felt > competent to produce the second stemmer is that I am a native speaker of > English, and so could make judgements about the performance of the earlier > stemmer. You could say there are two forms A and B: the Porter stemmer is > form A, put together quickly after looking at the grammar and morphology of > English, and the English stemmer is form B, a refinement of form A, done by > a native speaker after some years practical experience with using form A. > > The problem with the other snowball stemmers made by me is that they are all > in form A, and actually delicate improvements (going towards a form B) > should be done by people with better knowledge of the languages concerned > than I have. Consequently your email was important, but it's not clear (here > at snowball) what to do with it at the moment. > > An idea I had was to collect these suggestions, language by language, and > publish them in a significant place on the snowball site, as a resource to > others wishing to make further improvements. The truth is we do not get many > such suggestions. Here is one regarding the Russian stemmer from 13 Feb 2004, > > "May be you can help me, how to add just one exception: stem Kiev => Kiev." > > This has been stuck in my mind for the past seven years! Occasionally there > are more general criticisms, for example, > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.snowball/1046/match=swedish > > but they require the same treatment, and at present are similarly left > unresolved. Any suggestions on the way forward by "snowball regulars" would > be useful here, > > Martin > > At 05:39 PM 2/16/2011 +0100, [email protected] wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> I juste wonder if you had seen my post in december 2010: >> http://lists.tartarus.org/mailman/private/snowball-discuss/2010-December/th > read.html >> Thank you in advance and sorry to contact you like this. >> >> -- >> François-Xavier BOIS >> KerniX Software >> 15, rue Cels >> 75014 PARIS >> [email protected] >> tel : 01 53 98 73 43 >> > > > _______________________________________________ Snowball-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tartarus.org/mailman/listinfo/snowball-discuss