Re: french stemmer

François-Xavier Bois <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.search.snowball
Organization KerniX
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Martin,

I fully understand your point of view. I think, like you write, that 
listing all the possible "errors" language by language would be great 
because we could perhaps find new rules/behaviours . (Moreover it would 
naturaly build an excpetion thesaurus).
With this listing, I would be happy to try to add/modify rules for the 
french stemmer.

Thank you for your wonderful work.

François-Xavier BOIS
KerniX Software
15, rue Cels
75014 PARIS
[email protected]
tel : 01 53 98 73 43


Le 17/02/2011 09:27, Martin Porter a écrit :
> Dear Fracois-Xavier,
>
> Yes, I saw the post, was not sure how to reply, and so procrastinated. (I
> was intending to write quite a long note.) But your reminder prompts me to
> say something.
>
> There is, as you probably know, an English stemmer, which is (or is supposed
> to be) an improvement on the original Porter stemmer. The reason I felt
> competent to produce the second stemmer is that I am a native speaker of
> English, and so could make judgements about the performance of the earlier
> stemmer. You could say there are two forms A and B: the Porter stemmer is
> form A, put together quickly after looking at the grammar and morphology of
> English, and the English stemmer is form B, a refinement of form A, done by
> a native speaker after some years practical experience with using form A.
>
> The problem with the other snowball stemmers made by me is that they are all
> in form A, and actually delicate improvements (going towards a form B)
> should be done by people with better knowledge of the languages concerned
> than I have. Consequently your email was important, but it's not clear (here
> at snowball) what to do with it at the moment.
>
> An idea I had was to collect these suggestions, language by language, and
> publish them in a significant place on the snowball site, as a resource to
> others wishing to make further improvements. The truth is we do not get many
> such suggestions. Here is one regarding the Russian stemmer from 13 Feb 2004,
>
> "May be you can help me, how to add just one exception: stem Kiev =>  Kiev."
>
> This has been stuck in my mind for the past seven years! Occasionally there
> are more general criticisms, for example,
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.search.snowball/1046/match=swedish
>
> but they require the same treatment, and at present are similarly left
> unresolved. Any suggestions on the way forward by "snowball regulars" would
> be useful here,
>
> Martin
>
> At 05:39 PM 2/16/2011 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I juste wonder if you had seen my post in december 2010:
>> http://lists.tartarus.org/mailman/private/snowball-discuss/2010-December/th
> read.html
>> Thank you in advance and sorry to contact you like this.
>>
>> -- 
>> François-Xavier BOIS
>> KerniX Software
>> 15, rue Cels
>> 75014 PARIS
>> [email protected]
>> tel : 01 53 98 73 43
>>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Snowball-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.tartarus.org/mailman/listinfo/snowball-discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.