Re: Suggestion: 'aci'(<-'at')
Olly Betts <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:03:08 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.search.snowball |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:41:21PM +0100, James Aylett wrote: > On 30 Mar 2014, at 18:27, Chris Hennick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In English, the suffix 'acy' almost always corresponds to a cognate > > ending 'ate' (piracy, privacy, literacy, accuracy) or 'atic' > > (democracy, lunacy, trichromacy), so it'd be helpful if, like those, > > it stemmed to -at. (The only word I can think of where this isn't > > true is pharmacy, but I don't think any words derived from it would > > be affected.) > > I think these are also counter-cases: > > * conspiracy While "conspirate" may not be an English word, "conspirator" is. > * episcopacy It's a little obscure, but "episcopate" is cognate. > * fallacy > * lacy > * papacy > * racy > * supremacy > I think the only two likely to cause problems would be l-acy -> l-at, > r-acy -> r-at, which could be handled with a minimum length in the > rule. Also, I don't think you'd want to conflate "legacy" and "legate" (they may come from the same Latin root, but the meanings in English are rather different). Cheers, Olly