Re: Suggestion: 'aci'(<-'at')
Chris Hennick <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Mar 2014 19:43:54 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.search.snowball |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAPvCkbha-ccNn1EbqUfmx5C=c0AeeWko3uHQFyO8hwwWn83_VA@mail.gmail.com> |
So limit it to R2 -- that handles all the admitted counter-cases except supremacy, and even supremacy doesn't get conflated with other real words. On 2014-03-31 11:36 AM, "Olly Betts" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 03:41:21PM +0100, James Aylett wrote: > > On 30 Mar 2014, at 18:27, Chris Hennick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > In English, the suffix 'acy' almost always corresponds to a cognate > > > ending 'ate' (piracy, privacy, literacy, accuracy) or 'atic' > > > (democracy, lunacy, trichromacy), so it'd be helpful if, like those, > > > it stemmed to -at. (The only word I can think of where this isn't > > > true is pharmacy, but I don't think any words derived from it would > > > be affected.) > > > > I think these are also counter-cases: > > > > * conspiracy > > While "conspirate" may not be an English word, "conspirator" is. > > > * episcopacy > > It's a little obscure, but "episcopate" is cognate. > > > * fallacy > > * lacy > > * papacy > > * racy > > * supremacy > > I think the only two likely to cause problems would be l-acy -> l-at, > > r-acy -> r-at, which could be handled with a minimum length in the > > rule. > > Also, I don't think you'd want to conflate "legacy" and "legate" (they > may come from the same Latin root, but the meanings in English are > rather different). > > Cheers, > Olly > _______________________________________________ Snowball-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.tartarus.org/mailman/listinfo/snowball-discuss