Re: zeek performance with some events activated
Jim Mellander <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.detection.bro |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CADju=b6gbEdL6vqPiSm6W=Li0udSg7yc0rexBqVPcX1CBqhyVA@mail.gmail.com> |
Another consideration to think about is whether you can run against a pcap offline, or if you need realtime analysis. For offline analysis you can turn off all policies except the one you're particularly interested in. On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 9:40 AM Jon Siwek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:46 AM Palumbo Mauro <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I need to do some analysis on TCP flags and the event “tcp_packet” > perfectly fits my needs. However, as stated in Zeek’s documentation, using > this event may significantly affect Zeek’s performance, given the high > number of TCP packets to look into. > > > > Is there any other way to look into TCP flags? > > No other script-only method comes to mind. > > > Would bypassing scriptland and modifyng directly the C++ code be more > efficient (though not the “proper” way to do it)? > > Generally, yes. > > You could always do a quick measurement of whether handling just an > empty "tcp_packet" event is prohibitive for you use-case. If it's > not, then some other factors to help decide whether to proceed further > with script-only vs. C++ implementation might be: > > (1) Length of time it would take to fully implement and test the > script-only solution. If it's a lot of effort, might be worth just > starting from a C++ implementation. > > (2) Whether you plan to share this work w/ the wider community or it > just needs to work for your particular case (for the later a less > performant, script-only solution is more acceptable). > > - Jon > > _______________________________________________ > Zeek mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek _______________________________________________ Zeek mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/zeek