Re: IPFilter 5.0.5 - some new knobs...

Darren Reed <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.ipfilter
Message-ID <5480_1231419226_4965F759_5480_3060_1_4965F637.7090507@reed.wattle.id.au>
Ross Cameron wrote:
> Id rather point you're interest at SPA (Single Packet Authentication)
> from one project I've worked on we found that a determined enough
> person eventually finds the knock sequence.
>   

Do you have a research paper that discusses your findings?

> With SPA an encrypted payload is sent in one packet (almost impossible
> to find) to a random port (in our implimentation) and then the
> firewall rules are edited to only allow the source host access to
> whatever service.
>   

Is nmap able to distinguish the port you use here from other ports?

Darren

> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 10:42 PM, a b <[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>>> New features...and while I've got your attention,
>>> what features do you think ipfilter needs that it
>>> does not yet have?
>>>       
>> Port knocking.  I believe IPFilter would really benefit from this feature
>> for two reasons:
>>
>> 1. port knocking is obviously a useful security feature to have
>> 2. it will make IPFilter competitive with iptables.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live
>> Spaces. It's easy! Try it!
>>     
>
>
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.